Nuclear power is one thing*, but Frackin' with our water?
* not green(except for trickle up)
[What the frack is the connection to Newt Gingrich, well the paradox of green and being able to be a paradox period. His frackin' campaign seems to be burning the candle on both ends. But this is too complex for me to explain, except for the idea that he commits to Lean Six Sigma,*** but not to the concepts his staff thinks it will take to win. Is this a bringing it to the table moment ala the silver lining of the churned media cloud? It is bad enough that Republicans have enough money to run their lies in ads and Faux News, but they have enough to add cloud to the process.]
[Not to** mention lame stream media.]
** way
*** last frackin' link
[Post comments footnote(see my two comments): There is nothing wrong with Six Sigma as a tool, but it may be besides the point, but not aside from the point of whose hands it is in, and for what purpose it is wielded(people or profit). In fact, I believe that "Lean Six Sigma" violates "Six Sigma" principles by having a target of 25% spending reduction, which demonstrates my point on purposes and whose hands should wield it for what. Aside from the point: what the frack is the point of government?]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query frackin. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query frackin. Sort by date Show all posts
Friday, June 10, 2011
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Frackin' Trickle Down
Conservative Union V. Citizens United
Frackin' *Relativism, Dimentionalism and Slippery Slopes.
* I somehow stumbled upon this (Frackin')link and believe it was holding in draft, but could have just been a fortuitous slip of the fingers useful here
Frackin' *Relativism, Dimentionalism and Slippery Slopes.
* I somehow stumbled upon this (Frackin')link and believe it was holding in draft, but could have just been a fortuitous slip of the fingers useful here
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
What are the Frackin' Odds...
it's the frackin' spin!(?)
Well actually the original intent was the timing thing.
What are the odds, if you listen to Stephanie Miller and you google, you will find. Now...actually* before I take too many tangents I will simply fade...
(but with the intent to later find three points indicate a circle.)
...but it was not a tangent, it was the punchline of the google crack above.
Rather than explain the tangent or run the odds**, I will just note the connection point of contact in Exceptionalism.
* this was an odd thing and find. Below the you listen, and you google are what I believe few knew if it is true. That when Obama was blamed for saying there were 57 states and that that was Islamic, that there were actually 57 jurisdictions in the electoral process including uncommitteds?
**run is a pun on Runes and odds is a play on THE Pythagoras WAY.
[It is awkard to reflect the actual timeline but I did finish this post, and not POST it till I remembered to POST The Tetrahedron? post.]
[And wish to note that I am very concerned about Japan, but is there ever a time to let one's guard or humor down? But all humor is not created equal, let alone meaning.]
[BTW: Is there any meaning in Frackin' being a play on words, math, and related to energy? I will let you search for that, but it is not the ribble. Nor was it my intent.]
Well actually the original intent was the timing thing.
What are the odds, if you listen to Stephanie Miller and you google, you will find. Now...actually* before I take too many tangents I will simply fade...
(but with the intent to later find three points indicate a circle.)
...but it was not a tangent, it was the punchline of the google crack above.
Rather than explain the tangent or run the odds**, I will just note the connection point of contact in Exceptionalism.
* this was an odd thing and find. Below the you listen, and you google are what I believe few knew if it is true. That when Obama was blamed for saying there were 57 states and that that was Islamic, that there were actually 57 jurisdictions in the electoral process including uncommitteds?
**run is a pun on Runes and odds is a play on THE Pythagoras WAY.
[It is awkard to reflect the actual timeline but I did finish this post, and not POST it till I remembered to POST The Tetrahedron? post.]
[And wish to note that I am very concerned about Japan, but is there ever a time to let one's guard or humor down? But all humor is not created equal, let alone meaning.]
[BTW: Is there any meaning in Frackin' being a play on words, math, and related to energy? I will let you search for that, but it is not the ribble. Nor was it my intent.]
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
I Told You So.
NO... a lot of Frackin' People told us so.
[See CAUTION below]
In particular Aristotle and his physics not supplanted till Newton.
Just where am I coming from and where am I going? Good question, but for the moment I accidently clicked on a number of years ago and hit upon examples of the ongoing interpretation. [Interpretations and rules of power.(Or Not)]
[BTW: I have a few labels to catch up on, but I will make another connection. Prior to the earthquake, with the passing of David Broder, it occurred to me that one should not feel a loss, based on which side of the political spectrum(or geography) one is on. Not that it does not matter to many people. After the earthquake it is still all about how it effects us, not about how it impacts those that were closer to the problem.* But it is not wrong to politically learn from tragedy, or just plain expect be the cause. Not that I connect the cause, but there are laws, and always time for pause.]
* not to minimize nor distract from the Japan suffering, but it is very ironic that Ronald Reagan a product of GE, had his nine most dangerous words ("I'm from the government and I'm here to help.") and then his namesake USS Ronald Reagan has to navigate the perils of radiation from a product of GE.
[CAUTION: Some these links may be sensitive or insensitive** depending on you're own perspective, but I will add that some may be sufficient just to scroll over or click on for a hint of mine, and look forward to parsing or bolding some for better focus.]
** Lewis Black On Broadway? Frackin' or Bleepin' not employed, it will be the real deal(meaning not deleteds).
[See CAUTION below]
In particular Aristotle and his physics not supplanted till Newton.
Just where am I coming from and where am I going? Good question, but for the moment I accidently clicked on a number of years ago and hit upon examples of the ongoing interpretation. [Interpretations and rules of power.(Or Not)]
[BTW: I have a few labels to catch up on, but I will make another connection. Prior to the earthquake, with the passing of David Broder, it occurred to me that one should not feel a loss, based on which side of the political spectrum(or geography) one is on. Not that it does not matter to many people. After the earthquake it is still all about how it effects us, not about how it impacts those that were closer to the problem.* But it is not wrong to politically learn from tragedy, or just plain expect be the cause. Not that I connect the cause, but there are laws, and always time for pause.]
* not to minimize nor distract from the Japan suffering, but it is very ironic that Ronald Reagan a product of GE, had his nine most dangerous words ("I'm from the government and I'm here to help.") and then his namesake USS Ronald Reagan has to navigate the perils of radiation from a product of GE.
[CAUTION: Some these links may be sensitive or insensitive** depending on you're own perspective, but I will add that some may be sufficient just to scroll over or click on for a hint of mine, and look forward to parsing or bolding some for better focus.]
** Lewis Black On Broadway? Frackin' or Bleepin' not employed, it will be the real deal(meaning not deleteds).
Monday, February 27, 2012
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!]
Frackin'
Fudgin'
Freakin'
In-F-Able! -
Mitt,
Newt,
Ron,
Rick.
Not exactly a cross word, ribble or ineffable...
But by George, close enough for G work.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=close+enough+for
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/04/24/93492/steve-king-repeal-uncertainty/
[Speaking of ineffable...($F=G works) see previous post, Re:mouse and image/edit problems, not to 4close the word or scroll, over.]
[Please note that an anamoly has been cured. Which I hope to mention later...or knot[!]]
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/02/saint-or-um.html
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=311251275598904&id=100000176362685#!/permalink.php?story_fbid=371162076234764&id=100000176362685
Fudgin'
Freakin'
In-F-Able! -
Mitt,
Newt,
Ron,
Rick.
Not exactly a cross word, ribble or ineffable...
But by George, close enough for G work.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=close+enough+for
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/04/24/93492/steve-king-repeal-uncertainty/
[Speaking of ineffable...($F=G works) see previous post, Re:mouse and image/edit problems, not to 4close the word or scroll, over.]
[Please note that an anamoly has been cured. Which I hope to mention later...or knot[!]]
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/02/saint-or-um.html
http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=311251275598904&id=100000176362685#!/permalink.php?story_fbid=371162076234764&id=100000176362685
Tuesday, April 05, 2011
Navigation 3.0
Looking Back
and the path forward.
Yesterday was a rough day,[final straw?] sometimes you had to be there, other times things get in the way and I missed both and not in the normal way. Personally(really! however Really?) it was demand side* activities that ruled the day.
OBAMA 2012!
[Under Construction]TO BE EVOLVED:
Seattle AM 1090 (sidetrack)
NPR .org KUOW
Stephanie Miller
Thom Hartmann WOW => OpEd **
WeGotEd We Need Ed The Ed Show
Norman Goldman Plan
Randi Rhodes No Hair is Good Hair In con text?
Rachel Maddow [*] NOW
Center for American Progress
OurFuture.org
Just Foreign Policy
Progressive Policy Etc.
Steve Clemons
David Sirota[**]
Lawrence O'Donnell The Last Word***
FOKS News Bleeped and Frackin' and saved for later folks.
* no really, not Keynesian, but personally just real work, real demands
** two for one [Bernie Sanders and MoveOn]
*** yeah right moore left/
[Tom Yesterday? And Beyond. ]
[Note Labels(sic?), Lucky Three?]
[Go jump in the Lakoff, and this will be a the start of a project itself.
[*] BOLD ADDED 4-6-2011 and THE TEST.
[PopQuiz.]
[** bold added and update]
and the path forward.
Yesterday was a rough day,[final straw?] sometimes you had to be there, other times things get in the way and I missed both and not in the normal way. Personally(really! however Really?) it was demand side* activities that ruled the day.
OBAMA 2012!
[Under Construction]TO BE EVOLVED:
Seattle AM 1090 (sidetrack)
NPR .org KUOW
Stephanie Miller
Thom Hartmann WOW => OpEd **
WeGotEd We Need Ed The Ed Show
Norman Goldman Plan
Randi Rhodes No Hair is Good Hair In con text?
Rachel Maddow [*] NOW
Center for American Progress
OurFuture.org
Just Foreign Policy
Progressive Policy Etc.
Steve Clemons
David Sirota[**]
Lawrence O'Donnell The Last Word***
FOKS News Bleeped and Frackin' and saved for later folks.
* no really, not Keynesian, but personally just real work, real demands
** two for one [Bernie Sanders and MoveOn]
*** yeah right moore left/
[Tom Yesterday? And Beyond. ]
[Note Labels(sic?), Lucky Three?]
[Go jump in the Lakoff, and this will be a the start of a project itself.
[*] BOLD ADDED 4-6-2011 and THE TEST.
[PopQuiz.]
[** bold added and update]
Tuesday, August 07, 2012
Snooze Alarm
Something about Romney and...
(T M I)
These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***
[Not Exactly]
Dirty Harry and Fake My Day: Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...
...can't be put into words. Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which. Well... three words. Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able! Or goose the gander. I will hold off on the links for now. One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics. Another is "running". For what?(Or from...) Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot. How high is the cow pie? Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works. Could he trickle down any philosophy more? The pour won per cent[!]
* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons
***
(T M I)
These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***
[Not Exactly]
Dirty Harry and Fake My Day: Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...
...can't be put into words. Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which. Well... three words. Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able! Or goose the gander. I will hold off on the links for now. One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics. Another is "running". For what?(Or from...) Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot. How high is the cow pie? Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works. Could he trickle down any philosophy more? The pour won per cent[!]
* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons
***
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
Child's Play
Freak Show vs. Bogeyman:
* not that I take the Mediaite perspective (Donny Deutsch made a reasonable point, see negative/ugly/facts.)
While my original intent was the feeling that this is getting old, or rather childish. Then to see the nature of the exchange on Morning Joe, it takes some perspectivising.* Martin Bashir covers another aspect of the picture show. Back to the future, I mean Morning Joe, who is in the drivers seat? Mika or Joe? The image of President Obama getting into a car at an auto show. Who is in the drivers seat? Politically the President is. But it is like one of those drivers-ed cars with a second wheel and brakes on the passenger side, and congress is in that seat. But with Batman, I mean Bashir on West, Republicans would have no message if they did not have imagined monsters: "equality of achievement", "economic dependency"and "enslaving".
So...bottom line, Political is a double-edged sword. There is the race and there is the economy. Congress plays a role in both, and negative is not just ugly, it can have actual facts. So Mika can say that Obama is behind the wheel. And Joe can say he is not. Now you may see that the president is not the only one in the car, with a hand on the wheel.
[Not to call it a hatefest, just a hecuvafest.]
[Couched Analogy?]
[Action item: FEC apointments & expired terms]
** tba: no pun on SBA, but to be arranged
*** dba? a pun/myst on the "free market" need(see drives-ed car) for certainty
[BTW: if you need GPS, why not Ctrl F frackin' fudgin"? Pun with acronyms, not to mention initialism. Speaking of caricatures and labelism.]
Wednesday, September 03, 2014
FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014
Footnotes Page
in draft*
-
*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.
A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-
** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?
9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)
{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1. T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ... [any body love Rice? Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?. vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle, L. Mess Age Monger, M. Post-Turkey Day, N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns, Q. Go Purple!, R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @ {(~)} Future Bubble?
~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble!
TRP/RBTL:
in draft*
-
*(b.s.)=blog search
-
Re:labels & other blog spots.
A K A / August missing Footnotes Page
Categorical Empiricists ?**
-
** CAD (To be or not 3d) ?
9-9-14 Original Intent or in tent
(AM IT: [tan gent(~)] Andrea Mitchell ISIS Threat /-/ Witt Gen Stein/Jihadist Defeating IS IS?
This is not to pun or purge, but to more carefully review later, the word.)
{Stop.} At this point, I will change the heading of this link from #(9-3-14) to "FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE SEPTEMBER 2014"\
-
9-9-14{nexus}
PIT Spot? 1. T= A. PIT Schtick, B. Clause Wits (3.0)?, C. There is no Savior, :D, E: Three Clauses for ... [any body love Rice? Ronan Farrow Daily?]
2. Spoiler Alert? Not yet M-bed ed.
3. C-O.I.? = A.Original Intent?, B. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy, C. The Exit Strategy, D~?. vOO due: vCR, E. Where everyone needs to read..., F. Table of Contents, G. Health Care Summit, H. Progressive Poll I. What are the Frackin' Odds..., J.Happy Earth Day!, K.Try Angle, L. Mess Age Monger, M. Post-Turkey Day, N. Nadir, O. Clause Wits, P. Romer Resigns, Q. Go Purple!, R. Give an inch..., S. Temporal, T. Back to "The One Thing?". @ {(~)} Future Bubble?
~: OH REALLY FOG / Catch-44
4loreMat[?]: labels 3~ NFRY, meta/slash, P.C.? [/]4Ribble!
TRP/RBTL:
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
High8US
[7-6-11 links added]
(continued)
In ConText:
Over Helming.
Underwhelmed?
HiAteUS
Humpty Dumpty...
Ideology
Connecting the Dots
Way, Too Point Oh?
Way[!]
No Frackin' Way
Image Processing
Re:Verb
'nuff said
Ledership[!]
Antithesis of Nuance
Related sites:
Finance and Mandelbrot
Reader Supported News
Instutute for New Economic Thinking (Flip-flop and Obliquity)
The New Yorker*
The Economist
YouTube
Calm Pend I um? (or E'em)
*Footnote: Thank Finance and Mandelbrot for The New Yorker and The Economist links [also: errors(not fully read yet) and thank the Democrats for the YouTube.]
BTW: The above image and photo, did not turn out(inserted) as intended, not that there is anything wrong with that. (Sign Feld Pun )["Close enough for government work".[!] ]
[Writer's Almanac: KUOW, Natural Gas, Regenerating, Life After, Burning: Inslee and much More.]
(continued)
In ConText:
Over Helming.
Underwhelmed?
HiAteUS
Humpty Dumpty...
Ideology
Connecting the Dots
Way, Too Point Oh?
Way[!]
No Frackin' Way
Image Processing
Re:Verb
'nuff said
Ledership[!]
Antithesis of Nuance
Related sites:
Finance and Mandelbrot
Reader Supported News
Instutute for New Economic Thinking (Flip-flop and Obliquity)
The New Yorker*
The Economist
YouTube
Calm Pend I um? (or E'em)
*Footnote: Thank Finance and Mandelbrot for The New Yorker and The Economist links [also: errors(not fully read yet) and thank the Democrats for the YouTube.]
BTW: The above image and photo, did not turn out(inserted) as intended, not that there is anything wrong with that. (Sign Feld Pun )["Close enough for government work".[!] ]
[Writer's Almanac: KUOW, Natural Gas, Regenerating, Life After, Burning: Inslee and much More.]
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Read or Ship?
Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization? AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Tuesday, January 01, 2013
(fn)FOR D...
JAN 2012 FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR
1-3-13 The time and comment escapes me, not to mention* clogs**.
*Ironically(and indubitably) Perry is Right! (Scroll Click)
ROF, WOF
**SC(scroll click)(done)
(part two)
not4knot ornaught...
Budget Bandits?
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE (INCOMPLETE)
Clear Eyes,
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
A Triangle
First Sources $what does that mean?$
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!] (sc) or that?
Long Story (D-algorithm?)scroll over
Work is a four letter word. (ouch)
Everything on the table? (that's what I'm $alking about?)
Who's counting?
Emergency (Iraq) Supplemental Passes Senate: 51-47 (SC?)
One man, one vote for knot?
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
$not to cut it too corny or wonky, in terms of (fn) 5th Sense, but there is something fishy with the headings and scroll overs as I roll out the (b.s.) for "knot". Was it a my plan or the in-"F"-able that the 4F were anomolies not to mention the Supplemental?
1-3-13 The time and comment escapes me, not to mention* clogs**.
*Ironically(and indubitably) Perry is Right! (Scroll Click)
ROF, WOF
**SC(scroll click)(done)
(part two)
not4knot ornaught...
Budget Bandits?
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE (INCOMPLETE)
Clear Eyes,
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
A Triangle
First Sources $what does that mean?$
Frackin', Fudgin', Freakin', In-"F"-able[!] (sc) or that?
Long Story (D-algorithm?)scroll over
Work is a four letter word. (ouch)
Everything on the table? (that's what I'm $alking about?)
Who's counting?
Emergency (Iraq) Supplemental Passes Senate: 51-47 (SC?)
One man, one vote for knot?
i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
$not to cut it too corny or wonky, in terms of (fn) 5th Sense, but there is something fishy with the headings and scroll overs as I roll out the (b.s.) for "knot". Was it a my plan or the in-"F"-able that the 4F were anomolies not to mention the Supplemental?
Friday, June 17, 2011
Humpty Dumpty...
Sat* on a wall, and the yoke is on us.
[THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: Tikkun Magazine Man/June 2009]
[Saved in draft 6-16-11, redated as published with addendum, The Daily Rant on The Dylan Ratigan Show(Mark Ames: Exiled No More: IPO for America**). Where are the tin-foil hats now? If only this were only Fable TV.(To be clear, I am not suggesting second amendment solutions, but there is a difference between Sharon Angle exploiting fear for the sake of exploiting the people and the media, and a Ted Rall expounding upon and exploiting his solutions. Then there is a third tier, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow(and Dylan Radigan) exploiting and expounding upon the issues for ratings and our consideration.)]
[I had no idea this*** might be the e pit o'me (2).]
* William Grieder under Humpty Dumpty
** please excuse the "bat frackin'" language
*** or this
[footnote? [!] Draining the swamp, versus raising 'gators.]
6-19-11 High8US[!]
6-20-11 Bib Leo File Roar[!]Reread: THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: Tikkun Magazine Man/June 2009 The Wall? [!] "dark sarcasm"
[THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: Tikkun Magazine Man/June 2009]
[Saved in draft 6-16-11, redated as published with addendum, The Daily Rant on The Dylan Ratigan Show(Mark Ames: Exiled No More: IPO for America**). Where are the tin-foil hats now? If only this were only Fable TV.(To be clear, I am not suggesting second amendment solutions, but there is a difference between Sharon Angle exploiting fear for the sake of exploiting the people and the media, and a Ted Rall expounding upon and exploiting his solutions. Then there is a third tier, MSNBC's Rachel Maddow(and Dylan Radigan) exploiting and expounding upon the issues for ratings and our consideration.)]
[I had no idea this*** might be the e pit o'me (2).]
* William Grieder under Humpty Dumpty
** please excuse the "bat frackin'" language
*** or this
[footnote? [!] Draining the swamp, versus raising 'gators.]
6-19-11 High8US[!]
6-20-11 Bib Leo File Roar[!]Reread: THE ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: Tikkun Magazine Man/June 2009 The Wall? [!] "dark sarcasm"
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Bursting a Bubble.
Wind Energy vs NG
Pyramid Power?
Wind and Solar seem to be Natural Goods. Rising energy prices are seen as an incentive for alternatives. If you need rising natural gas prices to make wind or solar affordable it seems that there may be something wrong. Rising gax prices have not made nuclear affordable? I know there is no direct link there. But I must say the that it seems like bubble headed thinking. Now it may not be all about frackin' but there do seem to be risks to the environment. But the bubble I am talking about is the economic impact of any policy. Environmental impact is a cost that must be accounted for out of profits not as a cost of being at the bottom.
[A similar* pop or thought? * I am not sure where I may have misplaced the latter, but I did run into the author of the former.]
Pyramid Power?
Wind and Solar seem to be Natural Goods. Rising energy prices are seen as an incentive for alternatives. If you need rising natural gas prices to make wind or solar affordable it seems that there may be something wrong. Rising gax prices have not made nuclear affordable? I know there is no direct link there. But I must say the that it seems like bubble headed thinking. Now it may not be all about frackin' but there do seem to be risks to the environment. But the bubble I am talking about is the economic impact of any policy. Environmental impact is a cost that must be accounted for out of profits not as a cost of being at the bottom.
[A similar* pop or thought? * I am not sure where I may have misplaced the latter, but I did run into the author of the former.]
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Leaking Intelligence
Why are Republicans Forcing a Shutdown of Government? This is the ledership to a preemptive thought bubble blown earlier. i.e. I thought that the Republicans are going to force a shut down because they have already blamed one on the Democrats just as the Democrats are about to present their compromise. Now this is not to predict a shutdown, but it is easy for the Republicans to predict one. And indeed it may only be in the Democrats power to force one. Just look at Wisconsin. Woops, even their out of state filibuster did not stop the Republicans. Now, cutting the jest and my tangent. Back to the thought bubble. The Republicans may force a shutdown to blame the Democrats, or the Democrats may force a shutdown to hold their horses. It seems that false equivalents, make it either the Trojan Horse or the Four Horseman. But back to my thought bubble, I just said that.
{Further leaking of nuance and exceptionalism, the so-called Constitutionalists, orginal intenders, and frackin' flip-floppin' neo-cons or Libertarians forget all about the Bush administration and the congressional behaviour then. As I have sketchily outlined the constitution and the war powers act and the partiot act, the president is within his powers until the law or the spirit changes it. How much Iron Knee or I Ron Knee is there that the UN Libya resolution is Numbered 1973? Or that the Patriot act was just extended?
BTW: Freedom is not a license, in reaction to or spin-off of Bill Maher, in respect to the requirement of humor for him and not Beck or O'Reilly, and I might add or Trump a few others.
Hint: on labels and scroll-over tangent I have not always read nor will I read (or reread)all links that are embedded in my blog. But I do wish to note them as sometimes serving as footnotes which I sometimes google post post, which sometimes may just be scrolled over or glannced at after clicking on to get the gist of.
[Toxic Leak? I am concerned with the roles that government spouses play. Not to mention Media Matters and its battle with FOX related to its non-profit status. But let me burst my thought bubble. The Republicans may not hold together on the ability to shut it down, but it will likely be another extention. I don't think either side wants to shut it down, but look who's talking.]
[Speaking of breaking or thought: here is the why, which will be inserted later, but it is for now to get the Democrats to move, and blame them for failure when the Republicans can move the line away a better economy. Stuck bubble: Should Corporate Executive go to jail for killing people? No, since corporations are people the whole corporations should. Just being facitious but really, they should be paying the same taxe rates as people, and have passports.]
{Further leaking of nuance and exceptionalism, the so-called Constitutionalists, orginal intenders, and frackin' flip-floppin' neo-cons or Libertarians forget all about the Bush administration and the congressional behaviour then. As I have sketchily outlined the constitution and the war powers act and the partiot act, the president is within his powers until the law or the spirit changes it. How much Iron Knee or I Ron Knee is there that the UN Libya resolution is Numbered 1973? Or that the Patriot act was just extended?
BTW: Freedom is not a license, in reaction to or spin-off of Bill Maher, in respect to the requirement of humor for him and not Beck or O'Reilly, and I might add or Trump a few others.
Hint: on labels and scroll-over tangent I have not always read nor will I read (or reread)all links that are embedded in my blog. But I do wish to note them as sometimes serving as footnotes which I sometimes google post post, which sometimes may just be scrolled over or glannced at after clicking on to get the gist of.
[Toxic Leak? I am concerned with the roles that government spouses play. Not to mention Media Matters and its battle with FOX related to its non-profit status. But let me burst my thought bubble. The Republicans may not hold together on the ability to shut it down, but it will likely be another extention. I don't think either side wants to shut it down, but look who's talking.]
[Speaking of breaking or thought: here is the why, which will be inserted later, but it is for now to get the Democrats to move, and blame them for failure when the Republicans can move the line away a better economy. Stuck bubble: Should Corporate Executive go to jail for killing people? No, since corporations are people the whole corporations should. Just being facitious but really, they should be paying the same taxe rates as people, and have passports.]
Friday, April 29, 2011
Dog Days, Raven Nights?
Books to Read
Labels to Write*
[Under Construction]
Table of Contents
Phase II
Navigation: Chapter One
Sub-Chapter Labels.
Note Bold Link: Not Nature vs Nurture, but verse us.
Meanwhile:
Congratulations Andrew Villeneuve on a very inspriring program last night.
"Featuring Jay Inslee, Timothy Ford, Peter Steinbrueck, Scott Macklin, and Reuven Carlyle, with Bob Ferguson as Master of Ceremonies"
Rough Ramble:
"Try Corner Hat Trick": Note Search Box or you google. Top Left Corner of Blog
The Tetrahedron? Structure, Process, Needs, Purpose
*subtitle: Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity."For one thing linguists see valid ways of speaking all over, while lay people tend toward language chauvinism." Not that I am a third way.
Speaking of links and down under*** or frackin'** news.
** aka Churned
*** boomerang (BTW what is Australian for Head in Sand)
[Last link(s) embedded in *** un(bracketed) Hint: Jung Rang]
[Now I feel I need a road map for this post, but I will close with the two authors of two books I picked up last night: Lawrence Lessig and Stephen Colbert(now to find the other link)]
[Thom Hartmann: Economist Dr. Ravi Batra Regular guest?
[Sam Stein (HuffPo) Digital Team Returns to Obama 2012]
[OK, now I am off the charts, but I was search for a graph that would chart economic growth with deficit spending. My theory is that not only the trickle down did not work(for jobs), but it would have been worse if they had not continued to deficit spend, let alone not had wars. Not to mention, in the example(slide 14) charting the economy versus fund manager incomes.]
Labels to Write*
[Under Construction]
Table of Contents
Phase II
Navigation: Chapter One
Sub-Chapter Labels.
Note Bold Link: Not Nature vs Nurture, but verse us.
Meanwhile:
Congratulations Andrew Villeneuve on a very inspriring program last night.
"Featuring Jay Inslee, Timothy Ford, Peter Steinbrueck, Scott Macklin, and Reuven Carlyle, with Bob Ferguson as Master of Ceremonies"
Rough Ramble:
"Try Corner Hat Trick": Note Search Box or you google. Top Left Corner of Blog
The Tetrahedron? Structure, Process, Needs, Purpose
*subtitle: Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity."For one thing linguists see valid ways of speaking all over, while lay people tend toward language chauvinism." Not that I am a third way.
Speaking of links and down under*** or frackin'** news.
** aka Churned
*** boomerang (BTW what is Australian for Head in Sand)
[Last link(s) embedded in *** un(bracketed) Hint: Jung Rang]
[Now I feel I need a road map for this post, but I will close with the two authors of two books I picked up last night: Lawrence Lessig and Stephen Colbert(now to find the other link)]
[Thom Hartmann: Economist Dr. Ravi Batra Regular guest?
[Sam Stein (HuffPo) Digital Team Returns to Obama 2012]
[OK, now I am off the charts, but I was search for a graph that would chart economic growth with deficit spending. My theory is that not only the trickle down did not work(for jobs), but it would have been worse if they had not continued to deficit spend, let alone not had wars. Not to mention, in the example(slide 14) charting the economy versus fund manager incomes.]
Thursday, February 10, 2011
BLANK NETWORK
Dot Tool* to be named later. This is just a list of the Wills and Bills.
[Not Necessarily the News Guru, but divagation or not maybe linked.]
The Anti-Billy Club
The Club of Association
King of Rhetoric?
A Generous dia-Gnosis.
Report from Sabbatical
Sabbatical
This is not necessarily a Newshounds blog, Colbert Report or Daily Show.
I don't read or view things so you don't have to, sometimes you do, and sometimes just scrolling over may provide enough. It is divagation and stochastic at its best, or sometimes worst. But it is not just all about them or us. My Navigation label needs updating, and the Navigation II label is about our course, or a combination or demonstration of it.
While names are not the thing(and they are coming slowly today), there is value in comparing and contrasting, and sometimes associations matter. Leadership and representation matters, and in journalism there is the ledership which sometimes leads back to my point: our headings, navigation and having to follow for oneself. Part of the spirit of this has been diffused in all seriousness, by the focus on the list and the Bills and Wills, but it is more about the network and bringing things to the table. So while the banner or name for the effort is still pending, as well as more on the principles(The club of association) I will begin listing the inspirations for the columns or sides of the table.
* Blank Network (Anti-Billy Club: see links)
RESEARCH (So I am frackin' fudging a bit with the Will, the HasselB, and the Williams.)
Bill O'Reilly
George F. Will
Elizabeth HasselBECK
William Kristol
Walter Williams
William Safire
Willam F. Buckley
DEVELOPMENT
Bill Maher
Will Rogers
Bill Press
William Shakespeare
Similar Wills
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
Steve King
Sarah Palin
Michele Bachmann
Honorary Anti-Billy Clubs
Noam Chomsky
Thom Hartmann
Rachel Maddow
Jon Stewart
Steven Colbert
Lawrence O'Donnell
Norman Goldman
Ed Schultz
[Under-construction, italics are postumous honors. Apologies for the orders, they are at my whim or some consideration or other. It is not about heirarchy or honors, or just Bill O'Reilly and Bill Maher. And it may be asked, do some really want to be at the table? If they don't work well with others? That may play out as the list and the principles evolve.(Network Theory)]
[2-17-11 Update: Walk Like A Cheesehead. Wrap mine in tinfoil..PU! NOT! But close enough to government work.]
[Not Necessarily the News Guru, but divagation or not maybe linked.]
The Anti-Billy Club
The Club of Association
King of Rhetoric?
A Generous dia-Gnosis.
Report from Sabbatical
Sabbatical
This is not necessarily a Newshounds blog, Colbert Report or Daily Show.
I don't read or view things so you don't have to, sometimes you do, and sometimes just scrolling over may provide enough. It is divagation and stochastic at its best, or sometimes worst. But it is not just all about them or us. My Navigation label needs updating, and the Navigation II label is about our course, or a combination or demonstration of it.
While names are not the thing(and they are coming slowly today), there is value in comparing and contrasting, and sometimes associations matter. Leadership and representation matters, and in journalism there is the ledership which sometimes leads back to my point: our headings, navigation and having to follow for oneself. Part of the spirit of this has been diffused in all seriousness, by the focus on the list and the Bills and Wills, but it is more about the network and bringing things to the table. So while the banner or name for the effort is still pending, as well as more on the principles(The club of association) I will begin listing the inspirations for the columns or sides of the table.
* Blank Network (Anti-Billy Club: see links)
RESEARCH (So I am frackin' fudging a bit with the Will, the HasselB, and the Williams.)
Bill O'Reilly
George F. Will
Elizabeth HasselBECK
William Kristol
Walter Williams
William Safire
Willam F. Buckley
DEVELOPMENT
Bill Maher
Will Rogers
Bill Press
William Shakespeare
Similar Wills
Rush Limbaugh
Glenn Beck
Steve King
Sarah Palin
Michele Bachmann
Honorary Anti-Billy Clubs
Noam Chomsky
Thom Hartmann
Rachel Maddow
Jon Stewart
Steven Colbert
Lawrence O'Donnell
Norman Goldman
Ed Schultz
[Under-construction, italics are postumous honors. Apologies for the orders, they are at my whim or some consideration or other. It is not about heirarchy or honors, or just Bill O'Reilly and Bill Maher. And it may be asked, do some really want to be at the table? If they don't work well with others? That may play out as the list and the principles evolve.(Network Theory)]
[2-17-11 Update: Walk Like A Cheesehead. Wrap mine in tinfoil..PU! NOT! But close enough to government work.]
Parallel (Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels
[POST CONSTRUCTED 2-18-11]
Seriously from Media Matters with my spin.
Con-Text
2-9-11 A Generous Dia-Gnosis
- King of Rhetoric?
2-10-11 The Billy Club...
- The Club of Association
- Blank Network
2-11-11 Excitement in Egypt! [See Follow Up]
2-12-11 Bridging the English Channel
2-13-11 Frackin' Trickle Down
2-14-11 Said Relief?
- The Answering Machine...
- Fair and Balanced...
2-15-11 The Maze of Mace
2-16-11 Six-Edged Rhetoric
- Slash Segue
- Seconds
- Tip of the IceBurg
- Revisiting History
2-17-11 Recreating History
- The New Compendium
YES! THIS IS CON-TEXT TO A PARALLAX VIEW. and pun on the Billy Club and Blank Network to be named later.
The Pair o' Lax View* . I'm not just axing like Palin asks of Obama.
BUT THIS IS THE POINT!
The exchange between Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly actually makes both of them look better. It is the closest thing to two perspectives as might be found on FOX NEWS. Not that there is not a heckuva lot to pit and parse the cherries from the twigs, but there is something about the analysis(in the exchange) that may be not only valid but worth sorting and in respect to the audience about as much as they might be able to handle. That is not to say that it does not also serve as an inflammatory tool in a more nuanced way**.
* The Billy Maher/Elizabeth Hassel("Boy Billy")Beck Feud
** See BTW: Going Egypt...and Going Cheesehead
Seriously from Media Matters with my spin.
Con-Text
2-9-11 A Generous Dia-Gnosis
- King of Rhetoric?
2-10-11 The Billy Club...
- The Club of Association
- Blank Network
2-11-11 Excitement in Egypt! [See Follow Up]
2-12-11 Bridging the English Channel
2-13-11 Frackin' Trickle Down
2-14-11 Said Relief?
- The Answering Machine...
- Fair and Balanced...
2-15-11 The Maze of Mace
2-16-11 Six-Edged Rhetoric
- Slash Segue
- Seconds
- Tip of the IceBurg
- Revisiting History
2-17-11 Recreating History
- The New Compendium
YES! THIS IS CON-TEXT TO A PARALLAX VIEW. and pun on the Billy Club and Blank Network to be named later.
The Pair o' Lax View* . I'm not just axing like Palin asks of Obama.
BUT THIS IS THE POINT!
The exchange between Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly actually makes both of them look better. It is the closest thing to two perspectives as might be found on FOX NEWS. Not that there is not a heckuva lot to pit and parse the cherries from the twigs, but there is something about the analysis(in the exchange) that may be not only valid but worth sorting and in respect to the audience about as much as they might be able to handle. That is not to say that it does not also serve as an inflammatory tool in a more nuanced way**.
* The Billy Maher/Elizabeth Hassel("Boy Billy")Beck Feud
** See BTW: Going Egypt...and Going Cheesehead
Wednesday, October 08, 2014
Reading In Progress[***]
R.I.P.?
Bill Mauer and Sam Harris are the best case for religions.[***]
Before I exscrabble[!] my case, I note three reference points. First to Hegellian dialect(ic), second to democracy (Churchill)and the best, and third to Voltaire's gardening and the best. Let alone the full crumb or hinge pin of tolerance. * (neo?)
[binary references]
[!] Witt gen stein (and I hadn't even bit on the "binary" bit or subjective/objective "heritage".) Let alone hoist on his own cable.
*seg way D-fact-oh? ex facto[!] (paragraph 10 militance?)
(p ll clash reaction) [p12 "willy nilly"]{p14 Jell-oh}
"stacks the deck" shelter
Fn1 (original inserts R.I.P. / neo)
Fn2 (shelter / oh)**
Fn3 (crumb / hinge)
** HeGel
Fn4 “Religion is like a pair of shoes.....Find one that fits for you, but don't make me wear your shoes.” George Carlin
FP? : A. Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality, B.(R) F'n P[!] , C. Apples and Oranges and Cherry Picking.
(R) adjustment>B
1. Hegel, 2. Churchill, 3. Voltaire (i., ii.)
2b. C-p, 1. 2. 3. 4. What are the Frackin' Odds...
Steal [***] yourself 4 the binary.
Bill Mauer and Sam Harris are the best case for religions.[***]
Before I exscrabble[!] my case, I note three reference points. First to Hegellian dialect(ic), second to democracy (Churchill)and the best, and third to Voltaire's gardening and the best. Let alone the full crumb or hinge pin of tolerance. * (neo?)
[binary references]
[!] Witt gen stein (and I hadn't even bit on the "binary" bit or subjective/objective "heritage".) Let alone hoist on his own cable.
*seg way D-fact-oh? ex facto[!] (paragraph 10 militance?)
(p ll clash reaction) [p12 "willy nilly"]{p14 Jell-oh}
"stacks the deck" shelter
Fn1 (original inserts R.I.P. / neo)
Fn2 (shelter / oh)**
Fn3 (crumb / hinge)
** HeGel
Fn4 “Religion is like a pair of shoes.....Find one that fits for you, but don't make me wear your shoes.” George Carlin
FP? : A. Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality, B.(R) F'n P[!] , C. Apples and Oranges and Cherry Picking.
(R) adjustment>B
1. Hegel, 2. Churchill, 3. Voltaire (i., ii.)
2b. C-p, 1. 2. 3. 4. What are the Frackin' Odds...
Steal [***] yourself 4 the binary.
[***] (10-9-14) NOTE: 3 placements of the triple asterisk:
Heading, Lede and Steal. (Could read *Steele*.)
Three amigoes and the sine of the cross? Hume or Confucius? In the name of the age of consumerism to fed up. The branches(*4) of his(s)tory[!] Pythagorian, Platonic, Judeo, Christian, Papal, Islam... Every age has a pater and mater. We all need a John.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)